- Thread starter
- #11
Agreed it is not a "bug", but I wouldn't call it a "new feature" either.
Let's call it an "enhancement" to an existing feature
Now I was thinking again about this "enhancement"... Hwahrmann said results are displayed in the order the database returns them.
So my next question is : Is there a way to know what this order is ? I assume there is some kind of "logic" behind this, which I would like to know, so I can do something to get the albums displayed right. I suppose the DB always returns results consistenly, i.e according to the same default rules (I say this as I noticed the 5 discs are always shown in the same wrong order, so there seems to be a certain "rule" there from the DB).
And do you think that removing all 5 albums from the DB and then reintroducing them one by one and opening MP after each new addition would help ?
(For information, I checked inside the DB with an editor, and discs were correctly sorted there)
Thanks for your help.
PierreLo
Let's call it an "enhancement" to an existing feature
Now I was thinking again about this "enhancement"... Hwahrmann said results are displayed in the order the database returns them.
So my next question is : Is there a way to know what this order is ? I assume there is some kind of "logic" behind this, which I would like to know, so I can do something to get the albums displayed right. I suppose the DB always returns results consistenly, i.e according to the same default rules (I say this as I noticed the 5 discs are always shown in the same wrong order, so there seems to be a certain "rule" there from the DB).
And do you think that removing all 5 albums from the DB and then reintroducing them one by one and opening MP after each new addition would help ?
(For information, I checked inside the DB with an editor, and discs were correctly sorted there)
Thanks for your help.
PierreLo