- Moderator
- #11
For me, kodi has only one benefit: the fluid ui with the really amazing skins. But nevertheless mp is much better and intuitive to use. At least with a remote. Also, as lehmden said, the picture quality is far better in MP.
But I think that MP is only for windows and therefore uses the net framework is not only a bad point. The .net framework is for a developer such a good platform to use. It's easy to change things and it's good documented. I don't know much about plugin development in Kodi, but I think is harder to get started there with your own customizations.
Other users put maybe more value in a fluid ui, so they are disappointed with MP. I put more value in live TV, so I'm disappointed with kodi.
everyone should decide for himself which software he uses. Both has some benefits and some cons. MP has for me more benefits than kodi. So I use MP
Just my 2 cents from me. BTW: I used and tested both. MP and kodi (also dsplayer branch) on Linux and windows.
But I think that MP is only for windows and therefore uses the net framework is not only a bad point. The .net framework is for a developer such a good platform to use. It's easy to change things and it's good documented. I don't know much about plugin development in Kodi, but I think is harder to get started there with your own customizations.
Other users put maybe more value in a fluid ui, so they are disappointed with MP. I put more value in live TV, so I'm disappointed with kodi.
everyone should decide for himself which software he uses. Both has some benefits and some cons. MP has for me more benefits than kodi. So I use MP
Just my 2 cents from me. BTW: I used and tested both. MP and kodi (also dsplayer branch) on Linux and windows.