- Thread starter
- #101
AW: Re: MediaPortal 2 progress report
You're talking about UPnP/AV, which defines only basic media types. I don't know UPnP/AV very well since I didn't implement it yet. MediaPortal 2 only uses the underlaying UPnP protocol with our own communication device types.
But in general, UPnP is very flexible and I haven't read any UPnP specification which really restricts implementors; typically, those specifications contain a must-have universal set which can be extended by arbitrary elements.
We'll implement the UPnP/AV specification based on our UPnP library later to make MP2 UPnP/AV compliant, or even DLNA.
About MP2 and UPnP:
Today it seems that UPnP supports only a limited amount of media types, and one needs a transcoder for the non-supported stuff, is this correct? Or is it only the playback ability on the UPnP client that is the limitation?
You're talking about UPnP/AV, which defines only basic media types. I don't know UPnP/AV very well since I didn't implement it yet. MediaPortal 2 only uses the underlaying UPnP protocol with our own communication device types.
But in general, UPnP is very flexible and I haven't read any UPnP specification which really restricts implementors; typically, those specifications contain a must-have universal set which can be extended by arbitrary elements.
We'll implement the UPnP/AV specification based on our UPnP library later to make MP2 UPnP/AV compliant, or even DLNA.