On NA sats, the channel names dont get read in.
Even if you increase the PMT and SDT (which was the way to get it to work in the older SVNs)
What do you mean wtih "an installation like this" ?Still same answer: a proper MP 0.2.3.0 installation has been required once for SVN. Actually we shouldn't even pay attention if you report bugs with an installation like this - sorry...Also: The setup STILL does not detect MediaPortal and won't update the Client Plugin... Anyone else has that problem?
I have been running MP 0.2.3.0 (w/o TV Server) since it was released... I just updated to the SVN's since last week (both MP and TVServer) and I had to install 18215 in order for the setup to detect MediaPortal. Newer setups never found MediaPortal.
Why? Why does he think that? I'm not! What log or file should I post here to show evidence about what version I'm running?What do you mean wtih "an installation like this" ?
I have been running MP 0.2.3.0 (w/o TV Server) since it was released... I just updated to the SVN's since last week (both MP and TVServer) and I had to install 18215 in order for the setup to detect MediaPortal. Newer setups never found MediaPortal.
he is telling you that you are running mediaportal RC (release candidate).. and NOT the final release..
so go install the final release and your minor problem will vanish..
Why? Why does he think that? I'm not! What log or file should I post here to show evidence about what version I'm running?What do you mean wtih "an installation like this" ?
I have been running MP 0.2.3.0 (w/o TV Server) since it was released... I just updated to the SVN's since last week (both MP and TVServer) and I had to install 18215 in order for the setup to detect MediaPortal. Newer setups never found MediaPortal.
he is telling you that you are running mediaportal RC (release candidate).. and NOT the final release..
so go install the final release and your minor problem will vanish..
I never reported this problem before... I reviewed all the posts you made and I think you're referring to https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/...hot-03-30-2008-05-07h-revision-18395-a-37361/ ? I'll check my unintall information in the Control Panel. I did use an RC before, but I'm absolutely positive I installed the 0.2.3 final at some point (some days after it was released).Why? Why does he think that? I'm not! What log or file should I post here to show evidence about what version I'm running?
If you read carefully you shoul have noticed that I posted the same problem in the same thread you posted the problem for the first time. The reason for me was that the Windows uninstall infromation still showed RC although I had installed the Final. So please check Control Panel -> Software which release of MP is shown there, as this is the information the installer relies on.
I never reported this problem before...
I'll check my unintall information in the Control Panel. I did use an RC before, but I'm absolutely positive I installed the 0.2.3 final at some point (some days after it was released).
I think I fixed this. Most probably it was caused by the interface definition. Sent the patch to dman.Since version TVE3 18513 in error.log the following:
Code:2008-04-03 19:03:09.515625 [12]: Exception :System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt в TvLibrary.Interfaces.Analyzer.ITechnoTrend.IsCamPresent(Boolean& no) в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.TechnoTrend.IsCamPresent() в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.ConditionalAccess.IsCamReady() 2008-04-03 19:03:09.515625 [12]: Exception :Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt 2008-04-03 19:03:09.515625 [12]: site :Int32 IsCamPresent(Boolean ByRef) 2008-04-03 19:03:09.515625 [12]: source :TVLibrary 2008-04-03 19:03:09.515625 [12]: stacktrace: в TvLibrary.Interfaces.Analyzer.ITechnoTrend.IsCamPresent(Boolean& no) в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.TechnoTrend.IsCamPresent() в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.ConditionalAccess.IsCamReady() 2008-04-03 19:03:12.671875 [11]: Exception :System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt в TvLibrary.Interfaces.Analyzer.ITechnoTrend.IsCamPresent(Boolean& no) в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.TechnoTrend.IsCamPresent() в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.ConditionalAccess.IsCamReady() 2008-04-03 19:03:12.671875 [11]: Exception :Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt 2008-04-03 19:03:12.671875 [11]: site :Int32 IsCamPresent(Boolean ByRef) 2008-04-03 19:03:12.671875 [11]: source :TVLibrary 2008-04-03 19:03:12.671875 [11]: stacktrace: в TvLibrary.Interfaces.Analyzer.ITechnoTrend.IsCamPresent(Boolean& no) в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.TechnoTrend.IsCamPresent() в TvLibrary.Implementations.DVB.ConditionalAccess.IsCamReady()
Interesting..., any bad effects?
morpeus_xx is going to update some of this Technotrend handling since he has a card/CI & CAM to test against.
DMAN