WebMP Skin: BlueShift v4 (3 Viewers)

[Dragy]

Thanks for the tip _Layout.cshtml, I tried it but same issue for the css backgrounds under IE.

Add this in the body element in the style.css file:

background-attachment: fixed !important;

 

[umdanwait]

Thanks for the tip _Layout.cshtml, I tried it but same issue for the css backgrounds under IE.

Add this in the body element in the style.css file:

background-attachment: fixed !important;

Not working for me

I found next css fixes ands theses worked

body {
 
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorStr='#ffffff', EndColorStr='#ABC9D8'); /* IE8-9 */
 
}
 
 
 
#head {
 
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorStr='#000000', EndColorStr='#7db9e8'); /* IE8-9 */
 
}

 

[DieBagger]

Btw i would much prefer another name... BetterWebMP sounds like WebMP is bad in itself. While the default skin is very basic, WebMP is a great product and I don't like referring to a skin as it would be a superior product. I'm really bad with names, I'm sure someone can come up with a great one though...

Your call of course (and maybe I'm a bit "over-protective" ), just wanted to share my thoughts.

The skin itself is looking gorgeous, great work!!!

 

[valtam]

Looking good here

 

[Dragy]

Btw i would much prefer another name... BetterWebMP sounds like WebMP is bad in itself. While the default skin is very basic, WebMP is a great product and I don't like referring to a skin as it would be a superior product. I'm really bad with names, I'm sure someone can come up with a great one though...

Your call of course (and maybe I'm a bit "over-protective" ), just wanted to share my thoughts.

The skin itself is looking gorgeous, great work!!!

I totally agree in that I also had this in mind, but... yeah, I had to come up with something. And that's why the first sentence in the TS is where I ask for a nice name.

 

[Dragy]

New version in TS. Don't have time to make screenshots now (maybe someone else? ).

@mpsam: Sorry, still the same look for the covers.

This is mostly a bugfix release with a few enhancements and responsive design. It look good on lower screen resolutions also. It does even look okay on mobile phones, though the buttons are a little bit small. And the overal look is much better I think, new logo and I changed the menu colors.

Don't use < IE9, it's a stupid browser and I don't really care how it looks over there.

And it's important you guys do a hard refresh (CTRL + F5), or you might see some old styling.

 

[DieBagger]

Awesome, thx...

Regarding the layout for mobiles:

• Instead of "Open", maybe "Menu" would be a better button text?
• Like you said, the buttons are a bit tiny on mobile phones
• The layout became "unresponsive" on my phone, had to close the browser. I am using a very experimental 4.2 build though, so might just be my phone acting up.

Some name suggestions (like I said, not very good with names ):

• Dragy-Web / WebDragy / Dragy-WebMP
• BlueWeb
• Deep Blue

 

[SpudR]

How about calling it 'BlueShift' or 'Phased Blue'
It is indeed much nicer
Great job!

 

[valtam]

+1 for BlueShift

 

[megahorst]

I have found an issue within your skin:
For me live-tv is not possible. when choosing a channel name out of the epg I get an "page does not exist" error.
With the default skin it works fine.

Another question:
Is the implementation of additional music views a skinners job, or has it to be implemented in Oxan's sources?

Thx for spending your time for the community