Ok, i've thought about his a bit...
lets say we aussies start grabbing foxtel pages en masse (ignoring copyright for a moment)
Foxtel will notice the increase in traffic (maybe they read this forum anyway...i would)
Foxtel will have the IP address of all the naughty copyright infringers.
a better option would be :
one single person in a foreign country grabs the data and makes it available to the users who want it. There would be no discernable increase in foxtel web traffic, and no way of knowing how many people are leeching their data.
I feel that given the length they went to obfuscate (not encrypt) the current web pages, they are fairly serious about not letting the data out. If we start d/l the guide, they will change the way it's done, maybe to something that's a little harder to decode. then we're potentially screwed...
lets say we aussies start grabbing foxtel pages en masse (ignoring copyright for a moment)
Foxtel will notice the increase in traffic (maybe they read this forum anyway...i would)
Foxtel will have the IP address of all the naughty copyright infringers.
a better option would be :
one single person in a foreign country grabs the data and makes it available to the users who want it. There would be no discernable increase in foxtel web traffic, and no way of knowing how many people are leeching their data.
I feel that given the length they went to obfuscate (not encrypt) the current web pages, they are fairly serious about not letting the data out. If we start d/l the guide, they will change the way it's done, maybe to something that's a little harder to decode. then we're potentially screwed...