- March 17, 2008
- 1,353
- 306
- Home Country
- Netherlands
You're comparing an MPEG4 format to MPEG2.
Look better, you'll see compression in MPEG4. MPEG2 is also specifically designed to look better on analog screens.
So yes there are most certainly differences in quality.
IMGBURN just makes a 1:1 copy to the HD (so quality is exact same as original). MEncoder re-encodes the entire movie.
Therefore IMGBurn is faster too cause it doesn't have to re-encode stuff
Look better, you'll see compression in MPEG4. MPEG2 is also specifically designed to look better on analog screens.
So yes there are most certainly differences in quality.
IMGBURN just makes a 1:1 copy to the HD (so quality is exact same as original). MEncoder re-encodes the entire movie.
Therefore IMGBurn is faster too cause it doesn't have to re-encode stuff