Re: AW: MP-II development progress
Your post sounds as if MP2 would be a fork of XBMC. Which it clearly is not.
I just want to make that clear.
Also MP2 works completelly different than MP1. So integrating it into MP2 would allready require a big rewrite.
Since our developers are aware of quite a few design issues in TV-Server, they concluded that its better to do a clean slate and build a new engine based on the foundation offered by MP2.
Yes, but current MP1 does not even have a lot in common with current XMBC at all anymore. They only share the roots.Nothing.Erm..... what makes you think that MP2 is a fork of XBMC???
But MP was forked from XMBC or not?
MP2 was created from scratch. So the "MP1 started as a fork from xbmc" has nothing at all to do with MP2. Hence my confusion why you brought that up here in the MP2 thread.And while this code is old, you started a complete rewrite known as MP2 or not?
Your post sounds as if MP2 would be a fork of XBMC. Which it clearly is not.
I just want to make that clear.
The rewrite is required because when TV-Server was written, a lot of things were different - and not considered in design.And i thought in context to the fact the the TV Server is already written by MP Team that it doesn't need a complete rewrite.
Also MP2 works completelly different than MP1. So integrating it into MP2 would allready require a big rewrite.
Since our developers are aware of quite a few design issues in TV-Server, they concluded that its better to do a clean slate and build a new engine based on the foundation offered by MP2.