So we will recieve an Update within the nextThanks, I knew if I waited long enough someone else would fix it
[ ] hours
[ ] days
[ ] weeks
So we will recieve an Update within the nextThanks, I knew if I waited long enough someone else would fix it
So we will recieve an Update within the next
[ ] hours
[ ] days
[ ] weeks
So we will recieve an Update within the nextThanks, I knew if I waited long enough someone else would fix it
If Leo is o.k. with it, I could post the DLL's I compiled. Just be aware (even though I have not found any problems with it yet) it's at your own risk....
Alex
Probably not a good idea, since if you got from trunk, it contains a lot of changes (including database changes) which have not been fully tested yet.
https://code.google.com/p/jmm/wiki/JMM_Alpha_Test#Version_3.1.32_()
Then obviously I won't distribute it. I kind of figured you wouldn't want some random 3rd party build roaming out there, so that's why I asked....
Well it is open source for a reason
But given the number of significant schema changes since the last release, it is more than just the usual patched file.
Otherwise anyone is welcome to make fixes, and release them.
The message with Action
'http://tempuri.org/IJMMServer/GetContinueWatchingFilter' cannot be processed at the receiver, due to a ContractFilter mismatch at the EndpointDispatcher. This may be because of either a contract mismatch (mismatched Actions between sender and receiver) or a binding/security mismatch between the sender and the receiver. Check that sender and receiver have the same contract and the same binding (including security requirements, e.g. Message, Transport, None).