You will have to scan once for each channel and be sure to include the following "global" PIDs: PAT, CAT, SDT, NIT and EIT. Required channel PIDs would be PMT, EMM, ECM, video PIDs, audio PIDs and subtitle PIDs.
I think this could be a solution! So we would have a much higher bandwidth (~50Mbit/s) usage, but for a temporary solution this shouldn't be a problemBut you could remove the PID filter completely (pids=all).
Yes. This is also the underlying cause of all the problems that you're seeing.To save bandwidth we only request the pids for one channel...
Yes and no. The SDT and NIT PIDs also help you to get full channel information (name, encrypted/free, number, type) in the scan....but to get EPG we had to add the pids 16,17 and 18.
I don't quite agree. To be clear, the fact that the channel is in the PAT and SDT means that it would be found even if the PMT PID is blocked. If you were to allow only the PAT and correct PMT PID then you would get one channel... but it would have no name and EPG might not work.Now if we have a URL like:
zdf_neo
rtsp://192.168.178.44/?freq=394&msys=dvbc&sr=6900&mtype=256qam&pids=0,650,660,670,671,672,675,680,16,17,18
TvService finds around 10 new channels (because of the PMT)...
Yes, I agree....and adds these to the DB and all get the same url which can't work, because we get only the video and audio pids for zdf_neo.
Yes, I understand this example too.Maybe another example...
Right now this is pretty much the only way that the ONet (or any other SAT/CABLE>IP tuner will work with TV Server without code changes. It is not ideal because streaming only two transponders may saturate a 100 Mb/s connection and you don't get proper signal strength/quality readings. The only other way I can think of which would allow PID filtering to be used is to import the channels directly to the database rather than scanning... but of course creating the initial channel list is very time consuming. My approach is not to claim that hardware is supported until it works properly and that is why I previously said the ONet is not yet supported...I think this could be a solution! So we would have a much higher bandwidth (~50Mbit/s) usage, but for a temporary solution this shouldn't be a problemBut you could remove the PID filter completely (pids=all).
So we would have one url per transponder like it is in DVB-C.
The advantage would be much faster channel scans (compared to 3h).
I will try it this evening and report back here
a=fmtp:33 ver=<major>.<minor>;src=<srcID>;tuner=<feID>,<level>,<lock>,<quality>,<frequency>,<pol
arisation>,<system>,<type>,<pilots>,<roll_off>,<symbol_rate>,<fec_inner>;pids=<pid0>,…,<pidn>
Yep, I'm aware of this.you can get Level Lock and Quality it is in the sdp
No problem and thanks for the tip.ok if you that know, is all allright
and i has you missunderstood