1.22.0 Problem with Synology NAS ? (1 Viewer)

[framug]

Then may be simple way is the best way ?
I fixed the Synology problem for me (and for you, if you need dll).
It's up to you if you want users have this fix.
I leave you with "how code should be implemented in MP".

 

[ajs]

I dont use NAS name, i map NAS folder to Drive ...

--
WBR, ajs

 

[ajs]

We can change timeout to 1500 and test, if regress add settings to MP.xml and read when start

--
WBR, ajs

 

[ajs]

Or add setting to MP.xml and read when start

--
WBR, ajs

 

[framug]

I don't think we will have regress.
And, if you read posted logs, it is working fine.

 

[framug]

To definitively end with all that (and, hope you will think about it) :
You wrote me that it will not be same as before, treatment will be faster than before.
I have seen it for red dot and, it was great (one line change in tvplugin) but I suppose, a "really big" work in skin(s).
But finally, YOU DID IT for all users.
Here, what can I say ?
Finding the bug, preparing the DEV environment, keep logs to post it here problem before and, fixed definitively (until gplayer.play success)..., change code, tests and so on.
And (nicely) gave the code change for all users working (at least 1H00 spent on my free time).
And then ? One day to discuss without definitive integration.
I remember when RTV (a real big DEV, like Frodo) worked on MP, they analyzed my code (it's MANY years ago) and integrated it (sometimes with little changes).
For example the "same folder for all recording cards" or, ability to choose the tuner in "manual control" configuration to timeshift or recording test...
With just a SVN comment (it was not GIT this time) "thx framug".
It is simply as that....

 

[ajs]

I do not have time to make such changes, a lot of work at work, and household chores. Any option will suit me, but I won't be able to implement it. As the person who makes the changes decides and registers them, so be it.

 

[framug]

@ajs :
Hey my friend, nothing against you
I just pointed that instead of replace a "0" by a "5" easily (with a fast revert back if needed), we loose 1 day time for discuss about it.
And, I'm sorry, as explained before, I've not TIME to loose for that...
That's all.
I hope you will understand...

 

[azzuro]

@framug
please be patient, we have less dev than before ( thank to all new nano computer )
i pushed an fix, based on my initial proposal,
@framug i know the fix is more complex than your, please test it.

 

[azzuro]

file to test, based on master