Channel change times - what's yours? (1 Viewer)

Gixxer

Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • August 18, 2007
    1,383
    41
    40
    Spain
    Home Country
    Spain Spain
    does having a much better server computer improve the channel changing times? as in a better processor, motherboard or better memory ram?

    or up to a point its related with the tuner itself?

    i have an amd 1400 and if i change channel using the + and - channel button in the remote, it takes less than 4 secs (not complaining at all :D)
     

    allanp81

    Portal Pro
    October 24, 2006
    917
    41
    Well a core2duo will in theory be better than a 386 etc. but i'm sure you would reach a point where a faster processor won't improve speed of the tuner itself.
     

    Gixxer

    Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • August 18, 2007
    1,383
    41
    40
    Spain
    Home Country
    Spain Spain
    Well a core2duo will in theory be better than a 386 etc. but i'm sure you would reach a point where a faster processor won't improve speed of the tuner itself.

    thats what i want to find out, what processor will give me the best channel change performance without having to get the last quadcore.
     

    Paranoid Delusion

    Moderation Manager
  • Premium Supporter
  • June 13, 2005
    13,062
    2,978
    Cheshire
    Home Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Personally think speed is down to motherboard, how well it handles the pci\usb\firewire, after that its driver related.
     

    Gixxer

    Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • August 18, 2007
    1,383
    41
    40
    Spain
    Home Country
    Spain Spain
    interesting ! i get your point and agree. so better look at the new x48 chipset,right?
     

    Paranoid Delusion

    Moderation Manager
  • Premium Supporter
  • June 13, 2005
    13,062
    2,978
    Cheshire
    Home Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    so better look at the new x48 chipset,right

    From what i have read, it a very good chip, how it handles other hardware is going to make it or break it, if reviews about the x38 stability carry over into the new x48 chip, there may be problems looming.

    I would definately hold off on this one, untill its well established.
     

    Gixxer

    Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • August 18, 2007
    1,383
    41
    40
    Spain
    Home Country
    Spain Spain
    so better look at the new x48 chipset,right

    From what i have read, it a very good chip, how it handles other hardware is going to make it or break it, if reviews about the x38 stability carry over into the new x48 chip, there may be problems looming.

    I would definately hold off on this one, untill its well established.

    good point, i have read so many divers opinions about the x48. cant decide on which motherboard to buy for a quadcore.

    thanks for you opinion about it.
     

    dekkers

    Portal Pro
    December 2, 2006
    99
    0
    42
    Maasdijk
    Home Country
    Netherlands Netherlands
    In reality my channel changes are just as quick as a real set top box or tv with built in tuner.

    Can you please post your config (Card/Motherboard/CPU/etc). Maybe we can learn from you. :)
    Because my changing times are way higher then my settopbox (Card = Technotrend C1500 / Settopbox = Samsung DCB360).
     

    allanp81

    Portal Pro
    October 24, 2006
    917
    41
    In reality my channel changes are just as quick as a real set top box or tv with built in tuner.

    Can you please post your config (Card/Motherboard/CPU/etc). Maybe we can learn from you. :)
    Because my changing times are way higher then my settopbox (Card = Technotrend C1500 / Settopbox = Samsung DCB360).

    Sure:

    My server is a dell xps 210 with a core2duo 1.86ghz cpu with 2gig of ram. I have an avermedia pci-e DVB-T card, 2x nebula digitv usb DVB-T tuners and a firedtv DVB-S tuner. I'm running RC1 with the 19376 svn. I use sql express rather than mysql and apart from changing my recording locations my tvserver settings are virtually all left as the defaults.

    My clients are basically identical but obviously only running the tvserver client software rather than the tv server part. 1 client is connected to a Sony 46" LCD TV (46w3000) via a DVI connection and running in 1920x1080 and the other is connected to a Samsung 32" LCD TV (32R7something) and uses a VGA connection running at 1360x768. Both clients have an ATI x1300 graphics card with 256meg ram. I use Nvidia purecodec for mpeg2 decoding and CoreAVC for h.264 decoding and ac3filter for all audio.

    I run the indigo skin on both clients, and use the latest 2.1 version of it.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Similar threads

    MP1 MP2 [solved] channel numbers issue DE
    that's awesome, thank you! problem fixed. no idea how it got changed as I rarely go into the config.
    that's awesome, thank you! problem fixed. no idea how it got changed as I rarely go into the config.
    Hi, until recently i had my tv channels selectable by typing the channel number on my remote. for instance, i hit the number 9...
    Replies
    2
    Views
    760
    Ok, so perhaps a solution, but not the "right" solution. On the client, within media portal configuration, under TV settings, advanced options, I switched to UNC paths instead of the default RSS, and it's working very well. Sure I had to figure out the paths, but no big deal. Maybe helpful for someone in the future. Thanks for the...
    Ok, so perhaps a solution, but not the "right" solution. On the client, within media portal configuration, under TV settings...
    Hi folks. I have an issue with a new install/integration into my mediaportal system. I have a “mediaportal server” which has the TV...
    Replies
    5
    Views
    499
    thank you Sir, issue is definitely resolved now, i uninstalled the problematic MSE altogether, plus i also now have optimized EPG grabbing configuration, thanks again for all the assistance, wow so much faster on everything now that MSE is out of the picture...MP WAF is now restored and FetchTV STB sits in the corner collecting dust :)
    thank you Sir, issue is definitely resolved now, i uninstalled the problematic MSE altogether, plus i also now have optimized EPG...
    Long time MP user, and recently upgraded to MP1.34, prior to this upgrade, i have for many years successfully used MP with fast and...
    Replies
    20
    Views
    2K
    I've updated dlls in first post. Fixes: Summary / Overview was always empty Collections were not filtered to official ones Studios were not populated Fallback to english tagline didn't work Score / Popularity now empty instead of dummy rating and unknown popularity numbers Also I've tried to compile plugin against MP 1.34 x64 and...
    I've updated dlls in first post. Fixes: Summary / Overview was always empty Collections were not filtered to official ones Studios...
    Hi! TheTVDB.com has movies in their API now. API itself looks ok now so I decided to add TVDB to Moving Pictures. Check it if you...
    Replies
    2
    Views
    797
    MP1 MP2 MP2 - V2.5 No genres after upgrade to 2.5 DE
    You need to check the wiki for TVMosaic, you have recordings as source available once TVM is installed. And of course images and music are part of the NET6 version as for NET4. If you have issues with it further infos would be good.
    You need to check the wiki for TVMosaic, you have recordings as source available once TVM is installed. And of course images and...
    Make sure that your system (Windows, codecs and drivers) is up to date, matching the Requirements and you've filled in your System...
    Replies
    10
    Views
    3K
    Top Bottom