By "looking like" you mean how it actually Looks on the Screen?@aspik you should also ask about misisng features of MP2.
Aslo some users like me just don't like MP2 concept. It's looking too close to xbmc.
Nah, media handling conception.By "looking like" you mean how it actually Looks on the Screen?
Well thin can extremly be changed by a Skin.
That's an interesting point of view... and what do you like about the MP1 media concept? That every plugin has it's own database? How is this better than a centralized DB?Nah, media handling conception.
Please don't leave the discussion I think it's really important to have such discussions to solve confusions/misunderstanding about MP2.Edalex out
Referring to subs, completely agree with you, for me its also a showstopperAnd I will think that MP2 is ready for everyday use when it will have sibtilles, bluray external audio, video editions support.
Could you explain a bit more what you mean? what plugin/feature is this in MP1?video editions support.
External subtitlesHere subtitles are working without issues, so I don't understand this "showstopper"...
I like the approach MP1 when the music separately, as individual, Pictures separately. Video in a directory, and not as it is done in XBMC or moving pictures. There's all in a heap, and it's not convenient. If MP2 as well as in moving pictures or XBMC, and can not be done because the MP1, then perhaps I will refrain from MP2, until he shall live in MP1.That's what I meant about centralization, in MP1 you need an extra plugin for it, in MP2 it's already included